15الحياة في البر
الهدف 15: الحياة في البر — الكلمات المفتاحية للأبحاث
الكلمات المفتاحية التي تُنسب بها البحوث إلى الهدف 15 (الحياة في البر)، من قوائم Sustainability Research Mapping 2023.
القائمة الذهبية
الكلمات الذهبية
كلمات تدل على هذا الهدف وحدها. الرقم الصغير يشير إلى أهداف أخرى تشترك في الكلمة.
adaptive forest management12agenda 20308, 17agri-environment scheme2agri-environment schemes2bushmeat17climate finance13community forest17community forest management12community forestry17community-based forest management12deforestation and forest degradation13, 17deforestation rate17ecological conservation17forest certification12forest degradation17forest loss17forest management activities12forest management and conservation12forest management model12forest management plan12forest management planning12forest management plans12forest management practice12forest management practices12forest management regime12forest management regimes12forest management strategies12forest management system12forest management unit12grain for green17groundwater protection6intensive forest management12joint forest management12lake restoration6land restoration14mangrove restoration14marine strategy14marine strategy framework directive14marine strategy framework directive (msfd)14msfd14non-timber17non-timber forest product17non-timber forest products17participatory forest management12redd+13, 17redds13reducing emissions from deforestation13, 17reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation13, 17reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (redd+)13riparian restoration6river management6river restoration6soil and water conservation measure6soil and water conservation measures6strategy frame14strategy framework14stream restoration6sustainable development indicator8, 17sustainable development indicators8, 17sustainable development strategies8, 17sustainable development strategy8, 17sustainable forest12sustainable forest management12, 17sustainable forest management (sfm)12sustainable forestry12sustainable groundwater6sustainable groundwater management6sustainable harvest12sustainable land17sustainable land management17sustainable land use17timber forest17urban forest management11, 12water conservation measures6wetland protection6wetland restoration6, 14
أهم 100
أهم 100 كلمة
الكلمات المئة الأكثر صلة بهذا الهدف، مرتبة حسب المرتبة.
- 1endangered specie
- 2endangered species
- 3diversity conservation
- 4biodiversity conservation
- 5phytoremediation
- 6ecological restoration
- 7threatened species
- 8conservation status
- 9iucn
- 10predator-prey
- 11conservation plan
- 12afforestation
- 13alien species
- 14reforestation
- 15invasive plant
- 16conservation effort
- 17critically endangered
- 18conservation efforts
- 19biological invasion
- 20habitat loss
- 21nature conservation
- 22conservation planning
- 23oil conservation
- 24soil conservation
- 25conservation strategies
- 26introduced species
- 27exotic specie
- 28exotic species
- 29sustainable forest
- 30forest plan
- 31biological invasions
- 32habitat fragment
- 33ecosystem management
- 34conservation management
- 35habitat fragmentation
- 36natural regeneration
- 37revegetation
- 38iucn red list
- 39prey interaction
- 40species conservation
- 41invasive plants
- 42sustainable land
- 43invasive alien
- 44restoration project
- 45non-native species
- 46forest plant
- 47life management
- 48wildlife management
- 49conservation action
- 50management and conservation
- 51land restoration
- 52biodiversity loss
- 53environmental conservation
- 54conservation area
- 55prey model
- 56conservation value
- 57habitat suitability
- 58extinction risk
- 60conservation concern
- 61soil and water conservation
- 62conservation biology
- 63population declines
- 64phytoextract
- 65sustainable forest management
- 66invasive species
- 67phytoextraction
- 68ant invasion
- 69protected areas
- 70poaching
- 71forest conservation
- 72plant invasion
- 74prey interactions
- 75forest plantation
- 76vegetation restoration
- 77forest restoration
- 78predator-prey interaction
- 79effective conservation
- 80troglodyte
- 81native range
- 82native plants
- 83troglodytes
- 84panthera
- 85restoration projects
- 86wolves
- 87alien plant
- 88pan troglodytes
- 89conservation practice
- 90wildlife conservation
- 91contingent valuation
- 92predator-prey model
- 93native forest
- 94forest regeneration
- 95local extinction
- 96restoration efforts
- 97invasive weed
- 98conservation actions
- 99canis lupus
- 100plantation forest
أهم 1000
أهم 1000 كلمة
المرتبة والكلمة ومؤشراتها في Scopus.
986 كلمة معروضة
| المرتبة | الكلمة المفتاحية | أبحاث المجموعة | في Scopus كله | tf-idf | ٪ من Scopus |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | vegetation restoration | 3,335 | 3,504 | 18.97 | 95% |
| 2 | forest restoration | 3,331 | 3,549 | 18.95 | 94% |
| 3 | invasive plant species | 1,924 | 2,095 | 18.93 | 92% |
| 4 | invasive pest | 2,456 | 2,682 | 18.92 | 92% |
| 5 | natura 2000 | 2,750 | 2,997 | 18.92 | 92% |
| 6 | society for ecological restoration | 1,044 | 1,074 | 18.92 | 97% |
| 7 | vegetation recovery | 1,663 | 1,807 | 18.92 | 92% |
| 8 | plant invasions | 1,771 | 1,941 | 18.91 | 91% |
| 9 | plant invasion | 3,404 | 3,728 | 18.89 | 91% |
| 10 | wetland restoration | 1,899 | 2,112 | 18.89 | 90% |
| 11 | redd+ | 1,979 | 2,204 | 18.89 | 90% |
| 12 | invasive weed | 2,889 | 3,202 | 18.89 | 90% |
| 13 | forest recovery | 1,252 | 1,353 | 18.88 | 93% |
| 14 | iucn red list | 4,593 | 4,893 | 18.88 | 94% |
| 15 | river restoration | 2,156 | 2,416 | 18.88 | 89% |
| 16 | endangered plant | 2,165 | 2,439 | 18.87 | 89% |
| 17 | extinction risk | 3,838 | 4,209 | 18.86 | 91% |
| 18 | ursus arctos | 2,065 | 2,331 | 18.86 | 89% |
| 19 | invasive plants | 4,305 | 4,677 | 18.86 | 92% |
| 20 | forest management plan | 1,598 | 1,793 | 18.86 | 89% |
| 21 | forest regeneration | 2,972 | 3,344 | 18.85 | 89% |
| 22 | alien plants | 1,909 | 2,165 | 18.85 | 88% |
| 23 | non-native plant | 1,238 | 1,362 | 18.85 | 91% |
| 24 | phytoextraction | 3,642 | 4,053 | 18.84 | 90% |
| 25 | threatened species | 2,426 | 2,770 | 18.84 | 88% |
| 26 | plantation forest | 2,819 | 3,205 | 18.84 | 88% |
| 27 | alien plant | 3,087 | 3,495 | 18.84 | 88% |
| 28 | selective logging | 1,329 | 1,483 | 18.84 | 90% |
| 29 | forest plantations | 2,390 | 2,743 | 18.83 | 87% |
| 30 | invasive alien plant | 1,201 | 1,329 | 18.83 | 90% |
| 31 | planted forest | 1,386 | 1,565 | 18.82 | 89% |
| 32 | predator–prey model | 776 | 796 | 18.82 | 97% |
| 33 | marine strategy framework directive | 946 | 1,013 | 18.82 | 93% |
| 34 | sustainable forest management | 3,724 | 4,190 | 18.82 | 89% |
| 35 | plantation forests | 1,158 | 1,284 | 18.82 | 90% |
| 36 | phytoremediation potential | 1,127 | 1,245 | 18.82 | 91% |
| 37 | habitat restoration | 2,782 | 3,202 | 18.82 | 87% |
| 38 | conservation forest | 1,031 | 1,125 | 18.81 | 92% |
| 39 | invasive tree | 843 | 885 | 18.81 | 95% |
| 40 | iucn criteria | 838 | 879 | 18.81 | 95% |
| 41 | phytostabilization | 1,453 | 1,659 | 18.81 | 88% |
| 42 | habitat management | 2,739 | 3,172 | 18.81 | 86% |
| 43 | conservation target | 1,255 | 1,416 | 18.8 | 89% |
| 44 | invasive alien species | 2,555 | 2,972 | 18.8 | 86% |
| 45 | ecosystem restoration | 2,488 | 2,898 | 18.8 | 86% |
| 46 | phytoremediation | 1,929 | 2,250 | 18.8 | 86% |
| 47 | invasive population | 1,427 | 1,637 | 18.8 | 87% |
| 48 | forest plantation | 3,351 | 3,848 | 18.8 | 87% |
| 49 | plant conservation | 1,227 | 1,388 | 18.8 | 88% |
| 51 | introduced range | 1,193 | 1,347 | 18.79 | 89% |
| 52 | emerald ash borer | 817 | 863 | 18.79 | 95% |
| 53 | predator-prey system | 2,723 | 3,186 | 18.79 | 85% |
| 54 | biodiversity conservation | 3,382 | 3,907 | 18.78 | 87% |
| 55 | forest management practice | 1,648 | 1,929 | 18.78 | 85% |
| 56 | critically endangered species | 1,251 | 1,430 | 18.78 | 87% |
| 57 | elephas maximus | 1,109 | 1,248 | 18.78 | 89% |
| 58 | international union for conservation of nature | 1,536 | 1,793 | 18.78 | 86% |
| 59 | forest conservation | 3,417 | 3,958 | 18.78 | 86% |
| 60 | conservation targets | 1,026 | 1,143 | 18.78 | 90% |
| 61 | species recovery | 978 | 1,081 | 18.78 | 90% |
| 62 | panthera tigris | 1,057 | 1,186 | 18.77 | 89% |
| 63 | invasive grass | 836 | 901 | 18.77 | 93% |
| 64 | forest management practices | 1,503 | 1,765 | 18.76 | 85% |
| 65 | alien plant species | 1,028 | 1,154 | 18.76 | 89% |
| 66 | systematic conservation planning | 766 | 810 | 18.76 | 95% |
| 67 | invasive populations | 1,104 | 1,254 | 18.76 | 88% |
| 68 | invasive insect | 904 | 993 | 18.76 | 91% |
| 69 | planted forests | 924 | 1,021 | 18.76 | 90% |
| 70 | propagule pressure | 1,132 | 1,295 | 18.76 | 87% |
| 71 | reducing emissions from deforestation | 985 | 1,106 | 18.75 | 89% |
| 72 | invasive alien | 4,245 | 4,870 | 18.75 | 87% |
| 73 | natural regeneration | 4,700 | 5,325 | 18.75 | 88% |
| 74 | natura 2000 network | 818 | 888 | 18.74 | 92% |
| 75 | panthera pardus | 931 | 1,041 | 18.74 | 89% |
| 76 | invasibility | 1,102 | 1,268 | 18.74 | 87% |
| 77 | forest protection | 1,522 | 1,816 | 18.74 | 84% |
| 78 | sustainable land use | 1,895 | 2,285 | 18.74 | 83% |
| 79 | sustainable land management | 1,306 | 1,538 | 18.74 | 85% |
| 80 | prey model | 3,938 | 4,596 | 18.73 | 86% |
| 81 | predator–prey interaction | 982 | 1,114 | 18.73 | 88% |
| 82 | threatened plant | 985 | 1,120 | 18.73 | 88% |
| 83 | wildlife trade | 1,166 | 1,361 | 18.73 | 86% |
| 84 | systematic conservation | 833 | 918 | 18.73 | 91% |
| 85 | conservation of biodiversity | 2,172 | 2,639 | 18.73 | 82% |
| 86 | alien invasive | 1,053 | 1,215 | 18.72 | 87% |
| 87 | ailuropoda melanoleuca | 792 | 866 | 18.72 | 91% |
| 88 | zebra mussel | 1,681 | 2,039 | 18.72 | 82% |
| 89 | invasive species | 3,663 | 4,354 | 18.71 | 84% |
| 90 | flagship species | 790 | 868 | 18.71 | 91% |
| 91 | phytoextract | 3,726 | 4,428 | 18.71 | 84% |
| 92 | deforestation and forest degradation | 1,477 | 1,787 | 18.71 | 83% |
| 93 | afforested | 1,265 | 1,509 | 18.71 | 84% |
| 94 | conservation status | 1,332 | 1,598 | 18.71 | 83% |
| 95 | natura 2000 site | 746 | 813 | 18.7 | 92% |
| 96 | habitat conservation | 1,453 | 1,762 | 18.7 | 82% |
| 97 | soil and water conservation | 3,763 | 4,490 | 18.7 | 84% |
| 98 | red list categories | 615 | 637 | 18.7 | 97% |
| 99 | red list of threatened species | 789 | 874 | 18.7 | 90% |
| 100 | conservation of nature | 2,222 | 2,745 | 18.69 | 81% |
| 101 | ecological restoration project | 682 | 730 | 18.69 | 93% |
| 102 | forest management planning | 806 | 900 | 18.69 | 90% |
| 103 | river management | 2,253 | 2,792 | 18.69 | 81% |
| 104 | invasive alien plants | 782 | 870 | 18.69 | 90% |
| 105 | bird conservation | 1,302 | 1,577 | 18.69 | 83% |
| 106 | species invasion | 1,707 | 2,109 | 18.69 | 81% |
| 107 | reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation | 802 | 898 | 18.68 | 89% |
| 108 | species at risk | 974 | 1,135 | 18.68 | 86% |
| 109 | non-native plants | 693 | 754 | 18.67 | 92% |
| 110 | panthera onca | 677 | 732 | 18.67 | 92% |
| 111 | invasive weed optimization | 776 | 869 | 18.67 | 89% |
| 112 | zebra mussels | 1,083 | 1,292 | 18.67 | 84% |
| 113 | non-native species | 4,206 | 5,025 | 18.67 | 84% |
| 114 | marine strategy | 961 | 1,128 | 18.67 | 85% |
| 115 | exotic invasive | 704 | 773 | 18.66 | 91% |
| 116 | amphibian conservation | 584 | 608 | 18.66 | 96% |
| 117 | agrilus planipennis | 651 | 701 | 18.66 | 93% |
| 118 | soil restoration | 781 | 882 | 18.66 | 89% |
| 119 | chimpanzees (pan troglodytes) | 1,174 | 1,426 | 18.66 | 82% |
| 120 | pan troglodytes | 3,084 | 3,825 | 18.66 | 81% |
| 121 | brown bears | 1,035 | 1,236 | 18.66 | 84% |
| 122 | rare and endangered | 1,604 | 2,006 | 18.66 | 80% |
| 123 | invasive species management | 839 | 965 | 18.66 | 87% |
| 124 | sustainable groundwater | 981 | 1,164 | 18.65 | 84% |
| 125 | sustainable forest | 5,131 | 6,012 | 18.65 | 85% |
| 126 | in situ bioremediation | 1,027 | 1,229 | 18.65 | 84% |
| 127 | poaching | 3,430 | 4,233 | 18.65 | 81% |
| 128 | endangered plant species | 764 | 863 | 18.65 | 89% |
| 129 | wildlife management | 4,068 | 4,932 | 18.65 | 82% |
| 130 | remediation potential | 1,923 | 2,433 | 18.65 | 79% |
| 132 | predator–prey interactions | 777 | 888 | 18.64 | 88% |
| 133 | invasive plant | 7,854 | 8,551 | 18.64 | 92% |
| 134 | endangered species | 3,807 | 4,689 | 18.63 | 81% |
| 135 | species conservation | 4,348 | 5,270 | 18.63 | 83% |
| 136 | invasion biology | 890 | 1,051 | 18.63 | 85% |
| 137 | environmental accounting | 1,150 | 1,421 | 18.62 | 81% |
| 138 | weed optimization | 779 | 898 | 18.62 | 87% |
| 139 | plantation forestry | 884 | 1,047 | 18.62 | 84% |
| 140 | conservation land | 1,089 | 1,337 | 18.62 | 81% |
| 141 | phytoremediation plant | 776 | 895 | 18.62 | 87% |
| 142 | nonnative species | 798 | 927 | 18.62 | 86% |
| 143 | wolves (canis lupus) | 830 | 973 | 18.62 | 85% |
| 144 | ailuropoda | 809 | 944 | 18.62 | 86% |
| 145 | near threatened | 1,390 | 1,764 | 18.61 | 79% |
| 146 | risk of extinction | 2,173 | 2,805 | 18.61 | 77% |
| 147 | biodiversity protection | 1,125 | 1,397 | 18.61 | 81% |
| 148 | predator–prey | 2,386 | 3,079 | 18.61 | 77% |
| 149 | invasive exotic | 634 | 700 | 18.61 | 91% |
| 150 | brown bear | 1,584 | 2,035 | 18.61 | 78% |
| 151 | prey dynamics | 1,023 | 1,256 | 18.61 | 81% |
| 152 | lake management | 1,152 | 1,441 | 18.6 | 80% |
| 153 | cane toad | 746 | 864 | 18.6 | 86% |
| 154 | ecosystem recovery | 898 | 1,083 | 18.6 | 83% |
| 155 | wetland management | 1,040 | 1,287 | 18.6 | 81% |
| 156 | forest management strategies | 590 | 643 | 18.59 | 92% |
| 157 | forest management plans | 573 | 619 | 18.59 | 93% |
| 158 | river regulation | 1,263 | 1,606 | 18.59 | 79% |
| 159 | conservation priority | 1,498 | 1,935 | 18.59 | 77% |
| 160 | invasion risk | 796 | 941 | 18.59 | 85% |
| 161 | species extinction | 1,966 | 2,567 | 18.59 | 77% |
| 162 | species of conservation concern | 1,388 | 1,785 | 18.59 | 78% |
| 163 | ant invasion | 3,564 | 4,526 | 18.59 | 79% |
| 164 | invasive shrub | 528 | 558 | 18.59 | 95% |
| 165 | bioremediation process | 1,402 | 1,809 | 18.58 | 78% |
| 166 | agenda 2030 | 973 | 1,201 | 18.58 | 81% |
| 167 | society for conservation biology | 1,083 | 1,360 | 18.58 | 80% |
| 168 | international union for conservation of nature (iucn) | 690 | 792 | 18.58 | 87% |
| 169 | ecological restoration projects | 526 | 557 | 18.58 | 94% |
| 170 | iucn red list categories | 480 | 492 | 18.58 | 98% |
| 171 | invasive weeds | 690 | 793 | 18.58 | 87% |
| 172 | land conservation | 2,405 | 3,151 | 18.58 | 76% |
| 173 | invasion ecology | 727 | 847 | 18.58 | 86% |
| 174 | invasive range | 691 | 795 | 18.58 | 87% |
| 175 | wolf (canis lupus) | 724 | 844 | 18.58 | 86% |
| 176 | high conservation value | 1,080 | 1,361 | 18.57 | 79% |
| 177 | oil bioremediation | 711 | 829 | 18.57 | 86% |
| 178 | enemy release | 603 | 672 | 18.57 | 90% |
| 179 | valuation of ecosystem services | 843 | 1,022 | 18.57 | 82% |
| 180 | invaded range | 674 | 776 | 18.57 | 87% |
| 181 | wildlife conservation | 3,056 | 3,978 | 18.57 | 77% |
| 182 | rare and endangered species | 731 | 860 | 18.56 | 85% |
| 183 | convention on biological diversity | 1,833 | 2,424 | 18.56 | 76% |
| 184 | conservation of species | 751 | 894 | 18.56 | 84% |
| 185 | biological conservation | 932 | 1,165 | 18.55 | 80% |
| 187 | red list criteria | 503 | 535 | 18.55 | 94% |
| 188 | predator-prey dynamics | 697 | 819 | 18.55 | 85% |
| 189 | the convention on biological diversity | 1,405 | 1,854 | 18.54 | 76% |
| 190 | wetland conservation | 786 | 952 | 18.54 | 83% |
| 191 | sustainable development strategy | 959 | 1,208 | 18.54 | 79% |
| 192 | endangered tree | 551 | 607 | 18.54 | 91% |
| 193 | endangered plants | 628 | 720 | 18.54 | 87% |
| 195 | soil bioremediation | 605 | 690 | 18.53 | 88% |
| 196 | cane toads | 537 | 590 | 18.53 | 91% |
| 197 | invasion success | 1,532 | 2,049 | 18.53 | 75% |
| 198 | iucn red list of threatened species | 528 | 578 | 18.53 | 91% |
| 199 | gorilla gorilla | 909 | 1,148 | 18.52 | 79% |
| 200 | natura 2000 sites | 522 | 572 | 18.52 | 91% |
| 201 | conservation priorities | 1,765 | 2,400 | 18.51 | 74% |
| 202 | land restoration | 4,002 | 5,222 | 18.51 | 77% |
| 203 | species invasions | 800 | 995 | 18.51 | 80% |
| 204 | revegetation | 4,638 | 5,934 | 18.51 | 78% |
| 205 | giant panda (ailuropoda melanoleuca) | 466 | 495 | 18.51 | 94% |
| 206 | endangered bird | 573 | 654 | 18.5 | 88% |
| 207 | ecosystem management | 4,908 | 6,235 | 18.5 | 79% |
| 208 | environmental valuation | 621 | 727 | 18.5 | 85% |
| 209 | prey interactions | 3,371 | 4,498 | 18.5 | 75% |
| 210 | soil and water conservation measure | 612 | 714 | 18.5 | 86% |
| 211 | linepithema humile | 572 | 656 | 18.49 | 87% |
| 212 | species survival | 1,000 | 1,305 | 18.49 | 77% |
| 213 | protected area management | 831 | 1,049 | 18.49 | 79% |
| 214 | extinction risks | 523 | 583 | 18.49 | 90% |
| 215 | round goby | 671 | 807 | 18.49 | 83% |
| 216 | invasive crayfish | 430 | 448 | 18.49 | 96% |
| 217 | illegal hunting | 563 | 646 | 18.49 | 87% |
| 218 | sustainable development indicator | 561 | 643 | 18.49 | 87% |
| 219 | insect conservation | 616 | 728 | 18.48 | 85% |
| 220 | biological invasions | 4,937 | 6,339 | 18.48 | 78% |
| 221 | soil and water conservation measures | 590 | 691 | 18.48 | 85% |
| 222 | species management | 1,780 | 2,470 | 18.47 | 72% |
| 223 | ecological restoration | 10,605 | 11,584 | 18.47 | 92% |
| 224 | invasive predator | 543 | 622 | 18.47 | 87% |
| 225 | endangered species act | 1,713 | 2,390 | 18.46 | 72% |
| 226 | brown bear (ursus arctos) | 436 | 465 | 18.46 | 94% |
| 227 | threatened bird | 503 | 566 | 18.46 | 89% |
| 228 | phytoremediation efficiency | 486 | 541 | 18.46 | 90% |
| 229 | reforestation | 7,980 | 9,437 | 18.45 | 85% |
| 230 | sustainable development strategies | 641 | 780 | 18.45 | 82% |
| 231 | invasive pests | 520 | 595 | 18.45 | 87% |
| 232 | acinonyx jubatus | 592 | 706 | 18.45 | 84% |
| 233 | prey interaction | 4,466 | 5,915 | 18.45 | 76% |
| 234 | sustainable land | 4,286 | 5,715 | 18.45 | 75% |
| 235 | panthera | 3,165 | 4,372 | 18.44 | 72% |
| 236 | sustainable forestry | 932 | 1,238 | 18.44 | 75% |
| 237 | restoration success | 1,111 | 1,515 | 18.44 | 73% |
| 238 | federally endangered | 625 | 760 | 18.44 | 82% |
| 239 | native invasive | 570 | 676 | 18.44 | 84% |
| 240 | sustainable groundwater management | 478 | 535 | 18.44 | 89% |
| 241 | population viability analysis | 863 | 1,137 | 18.43 | 76% |
| 242 | iucn red list criteria | 406 | 428 | 18.43 | 95% |
| 243 | forest management unit | 443 | 484 | 18.43 | 92% |
| 244 | gorilla gorilla gorilla | 483 | 545 | 18.43 | 89% |
| 245 | bioremediation potential | 602 | 730 | 18.43 | 82% |
| 246 | predator-prey systems | 680 | 853 | 18.43 | 80% |
| 247 | landscape restoration | 778 | 1,008 | 18.43 | 77% |
| 248 | conservation actions | 2,882 | 4,052 | 18.42 | 71% |
| 249 | extinction probability | 678 | 852 | 18.42 | 80% |
| 250 | conservation planning | 6,404 | 8,059 | 18.42 | 79% |
| 251 | water and soil conservation | 570 | 683 | 18.42 | 83% |
| 252 | argentine ant | 603 | 735 | 18.42 | 82% |
| 253 | introduced species | 5,247 | 6,866 | 18.42 | 76% |
| 254 | carnivore conservation | 413 | 442 | 18.42 | 93% |
| 255 | critically endangered | 7,401 | 9,052 | 18.42 | 82% |
| 256 | prey models | 687 | 870 | 18.42 | 79% |
| 257 | non-native invasive | 421 | 455 | 18.42 | 93% |
| 258 | reforestation program | 542 | 642 | 18.41 | 84% |
| 259 | non-native plant species | 417 | 450 | 18.41 | 93% |
| 260 | habitats directive | 1,074 | 1,485 | 18.41 | 72% |
| 261 | restoration efforts | 2,891 | 4,097 | 18.41 | 71% |
| 262 | sustainable development indicators | 488 | 560 | 18.41 | 87% |
| 263 | linepithema | 583 | 709 | 18.41 | 82% |
| 264 | land desertification | 527 | 621 | 18.41 | 85% |
| 265 | biodiversity target | 482 | 551 | 18.41 | 87% |
| 266 | groundwater protection | 1,002 | 1,375 | 18.41 | 73% |
| 267 | lake restoration | 817 | 1,082 | 18.41 | 76% |
| 268 | exotic pest | 511 | 597 | 18.41 | 86% |
| 269 | native biodiversity | 883 | 1,188 | 18.41 | 74% |
| 270 | new forest | 1,136 | 1,592 | 18.4 | 71% |
| 271 | protected areas (pas) | 878 | 1,185 | 18.4 | 74% |
| 272 | management strategy evaluation | 396 | 422 | 18.4 | 94% |
| 273 | dreissena polymorpha | 1,438 | 2,063 | 18.4 | 70% |
| 275 | conservation value | 3,902 | 5,408 | 18.39 | 72% |
| 276 | forest degradation | 2,599 | 3,746 | 18.39 | 69% |
| 277 | alien invasive species | 501 | 587 | 18.39 | 85% |
| 278 | endangered status | 492 | 574 | 18.39 | 86% |
| 279 | large carnivore | 1,605 | 2,332 | 18.38 | 69% |
| 280 | restoration projects | 3,126 | 4,462 | 18.38 | 70% |
| 281 | enhanced bioremediation | 456 | 519 | 18.38 | 88% |
| 282 | acinonyx | 604 | 754 | 18.38 | 80% |
| 283 | forestry management | 868 | 1,180 | 18.38 | 74% |
| 285 | data deficient | 853 | 1,158 | 18.38 | 74% |
| 286 | asian elephant | 1,074 | 1,513 | 18.38 | 71% |
| 287 | invasive weed optimization (iwo) | 398 | 431 | 18.38 | 92% |
| 288 | restoration ecology | 973 | 1,354 | 18.38 | 72% |
| 289 | aquatic invasive | 636 | 809 | 18.38 | 79% |
| 290 | convention on international trade in endangered species | 527 | 634 | 18.37 | 83% |
| 291 | exotic plant | 2,330 | 3,403 | 18.37 | 68% |
| 292 | bioremediation strategies | 589 | 735 | 18.37 | 80% |
| 293 | forest certification | 728 | 961 | 18.37 | 76% |
| 294 | pan paniscus | 660 | 851 | 18.37 | 78% |
| 295 | bushmeat | 762 | 1,018 | 18.37 | 75% |
| 296 | invasion dynamics | 558 | 687 | 18.37 | 81% |
| 297 | iucn red list categories and criteria | 341 | 347 | 18.37 | 98% |
| 298 | large carnivores | 1,298 | 1,880 | 18.37 | 69% |
| 299 | melanoleuca | 806 | 1,094 | 18.36 | 74% |
| 300 | animal conservation | 438 | 498 | 18.36 | 88% |
| 301 | endangered animal | 522 | 632 | 18.36 | 83% |
| 302 | conservation assessment | 1,082 | 1,543 | 18.36 | 70% |
| 303 | conservation concern | 3,801 | 5,384 | 18.36 | 71% |
| 304 | the red list | 707 | 935 | 18.36 | 76% |
| 305 | conifer plantation | 586 | 738 | 18.35 | 79% |
| 306 | grizzly bears | 568 | 709 | 18.35 | 80% |
| 307 | trichechus manatus | 480 | 567 | 18.35 | 85% |
| 308 | forest management activities | 440 | 504 | 18.35 | 87% |
| 309 | iucn | 9,809 | 11,566 | 18.35 | 85% |
| 310 | conservation action | 4,037 | 5,695 | 18.35 | 71% |
| 311 | troglodytes | 3,199 | 4,637 | 18.35 | 69% |
| 312 | conservation outcomes | 862 | 1,196 | 18.34 | 72% |
| 313 | local extinctions | 918 | 1,288 | 18.34 | 71% |
| 314 | restoration programs | 957 | 1,352 | 18.34 | 71% |
| 315 | endangered medicinal plant | 525 | 643 | 18.34 | 82% |
| 316 | conservation outcome | 903 | 1,265 | 18.34 | 71% |
| 317 | conservation plans | 1,575 | 2,339 | 18.34 | 67% |
| 318 | conservation prioritization | 524 | 642 | 18.34 | 82% |
| 319 | environmental conservation | 3,958 | 5,620 | 18.34 | 70% |
| 320 | agrilus planipennis fairmaire | 361 | 384 | 18.34 | 94% |
| 321 | exotic plant invasion | 344 | 358 | 18.34 | 96% |
| 322 | neogobius melanostomus | 594 | 759 | 18.34 | 78% |
| 323 | globally threatened | 761 | 1,035 | 18.34 | 74% |
| 324 | trichechus | 536 | 664 | 18.34 | 81% |
| 325 | integrated valuation | 474 | 564 | 18.33 | 84% |
| 326 | plant invader | 363 | 389 | 18.33 | 93% |
| 327 | bioremediation processes | 637 | 833 | 18.33 | 76% |
| 328 | alien species | 8,077 | 10,096 | 18.33 | 80% |
| 329 | restoration goal | 611 | 791 | 18.33 | 77% |
| 330 | afforestation | 8,568 | 10,560 | 18.33 | 81% |
| 331 | asian elephants (elephas maximus) | 374 | 407 | 18.33 | 92% |
| 332 | troglodyte | 3,214 | 4,708 | 18.33 | 68% |
| 333 | conservation implication | 1,431 | 2,134 | 18.33 | 67% |
| 334 | canis lupus | 2,842 | 4,212 | 18.33 | 67% |
| 335 | soil conservation measure | 558 | 705 | 18.32 | 79% |
| 336 | rhinopithecus | 447 | 524 | 18.32 | 85% |
| 337 | bioremediation of soil | 470 | 562 | 18.32 | 84% |
| 338 | conservation implications | 1,394 | 2,085 | 18.32 | 67% |
| 339 | conservation reserve | 1,041 | 1,513 | 18.32 | 69% |
| 340 | conservation areas | 2,397 | 3,610 | 18.31 | 66% |
| 341 | habitat loss and fragmentation | 1,038 | 1,512 | 18.31 | 69% |
| 342 | native plant species | 1,764 | 2,672 | 18.31 | 66% |
| 343 | ecosystem assessment | 961 | 1,386 | 18.31 | 69% |
| 344 | soil conservation measures | 538 | 679 | 18.31 | 79% |
| 345 | exotic plants | 1,156 | 1,711 | 18.31 | 68% |
| 346 | desertification control | 447 | 530 | 18.31 | 84% |
| 347 | native species richness | 503 | 622 | 18.31 | 81% |
| 348 | iucn categories | 350 | 376 | 18.3 | 93% |
| 349 | species extinctions | 655 | 878 | 18.3 | 75% |
| 350 | forest biodiversity | 1,295 | 1,948 | 18.3 | 66% |
| 351 | threatened plant species | 372 | 412 | 18.3 | 90% |
| 352 | wildlife conflict | 1,716 | 2,621 | 18.3 | 65% |
| 353 | community forest management | 375 | 417 | 18.3 | 90% |
| 354 | restoration goals | 549 | 703 | 18.29 | 78% |
| 355 | predator-prey models | 519 | 653 | 18.29 | 79% |
| 356 | restoration area | 532 | 675 | 18.29 | 79% |
| 357 | threatened plants | 405 | 466 | 18.29 | 87% |
| 358 | phytoextraction potential | 320 | 332 | 18.29 | 96% |
| 359 | population declines | 3,730 | 5,478 | 18.29 | 68% |
| 360 | biological invasion | 7,052 | 9,266 | 18.29 | 76% |
| 361 | invasive success | 390 | 443 | 18.29 | 88% |
| 362 | legal wildlife trade | 442 | 528 | 18.29 | 84% |
| 363 | management of protected areas | 471 | 576 | 18.29 | 82% |
| 364 | soil conservation practice | 511 | 643 | 18.29 | 79% |
| 365 | illegal wildlife trade | 435 | 517 | 18.29 | 84% |
| 366 | priority conservation | 512 | 645 | 18.29 | 79% |
| 367 | invading species | 539 | 691 | 18.28 | 78% |
| 368 | restoration practice | 869 | 1,252 | 18.28 | 69% |
| 369 | threatened and endangered species | 515 | 651 | 18.28 | 79% |
| 370 | extinction debt | 387 | 440 | 18.28 | 88% |
| 371 | conservation unit | 1,350 | 2,060 | 18.28 | 66% |
| 372 | effective conservation | 3,216 | 4,831 | 18.28 | 67% |
| 373 | restoration measures | 1,107 | 1,659 | 18.28 | 67% |
| 374 | agrilus | 712 | 989 | 18.28 | 72% |
| 375 | invasive alien species (ias) | 420 | 496 | 18.27 | 85% |
| 376 | threatened and endangered | 730 | 1,021 | 18.27 | 71% |
| 377 | marine strategy framework directive (msfd) | 347 | 378 | 18.27 | 92% |
| 378 | asian elephants | 727 | 1,017 | 18.27 | 71% |
| 379 | aquatic invasive species | 512 | 651 | 18.27 | 79% |
| 380 | grizzly bear | 710 | 989 | 18.27 | 72% |
| 381 | restoration measure | 1,201 | 1,825 | 18.27 | 66% |
| 382 | dreissena | 1,672 | 2,593 | 18.27 | 64% |
| 383 | conservation importance | 703 | 979 | 18.27 | 72% |
| 384 | aichi target | 388 | 446 | 18.27 | 87% |
| 385 | local extinction | 2,969 | 4,521 | 18.27 | 66% |
| 386 | biodiversity targets | 387 | 445 | 18.26 | 87% |
| 387 | asian clam | 351 | 387 | 18.26 | 91% |
| 389 | umbrella species | 409 | 483 | 18.26 | 85% |
| 390 | extinction rates | 1,166 | 1,777 | 18.26 | 66% |
| 391 | community forest | 1,588 | 2,473 | 18.26 | 64% |
| 392 | desertification process | 528 | 684 | 18.26 | 77% |
| 393 | poachers | 537 | 700 | 18.25 | 77% |
| 394 | snub-nosed monkey | 379 | 435 | 18.25 | 87% |
| 395 | convention on biological diversity (cbd) | 586 | 785 | 18.25 | 75% |
| 396 | soil conservation | 6,215 | 8,542 | 18.25 | 73% |
| 397 | invaded area | 838 | 1,222 | 18.25 | 69% |
| 398 | argentine ants | 319 | 339 | 18.25 | 94% |
| 399 | soil conservation practices | 463 | 576 | 18.25 | 80% |
| 400 | zebra mussel (dreissena polymorpha) | 378 | 435 | 18.25 | 87% |
| 401 | conservation breeding | 346 | 383 | 18.25 | 90% |
| 402 | elephas | 1,160 | 1,777 | 18.25 | 65% |
| 403 | conservation units | 908 | 1,346 | 18.25 | 67% |
| 404 | conservation goals | 1,335 | 2,075 | 18.24 | 64% |
| 405 | invasive grasses | 313 | 332 | 18.24 | 94% |
| 406 | invasive alien plant species | 338 | 372 | 18.24 | 91% |
| 407 | red list assessment | 336 | 369 | 18.24 | 91% |
| 408 | conservation goal | 1,467 | 2,300 | 18.24 | 64% |
| 409 | oil conservation | 6,218 | 8,607 | 18.24 | 72% |
| 410 | giant panda | 1,096 | 1,685 | 18.23 | 65% |
| 411 | forest plant | 4,124 | 6,157 | 18.23 | 67% |
| 412 | aerobic bioremediation | 353 | 399 | 18.23 | 88% |
| 413 | assisted phytoremediation | 392 | 464 | 18.23 | 84% |
| 414 | nature conservation | 6,739 | 9,210 | 18.23 | 73% |
| 415 | pongo pygmaeus | 599 | 820 | 18.23 | 73% |
| 416 | native and invasive species | 348 | 392 | 18.22 | 89% |
| 417 | human-wildlife conflict | 1,195 | 1,860 | 18.22 | 64% |
| 418 | population viability | 1,998 | 3,179 | 18.22 | 63% |
| 419 | invasive fish | 697 | 996 | 18.22 | 70% |
| 420 | wetland protection | 453 | 570 | 18.22 | 79% |
| 421 | area of occupancy | 470 | 600 | 18.22 | 78% |
| 422 | invasive ants | 330 | 365 | 18.21 | 90% |
| 423 | restoration and management | 727 | 1,053 | 18.21 | 69% |
| 424 | endangered tree species | 319 | 348 | 18.21 | 92% |
| 425 | deforestation and degradation | 475 | 611 | 18.21 | 78% |
| 426 | fauna & flora international | 387 | 461 | 18.21 | 84% |
| 427 | exotic plant species | 587 | 808 | 18.21 | 73% |
| 428 | farmland protection | 351 | 401 | 18.21 | 88% |
| 429 | at-risk species | 313 | 339 | 18.21 | 92% |
| 430 | sustainable land-use | 403 | 489 | 18.21 | 82% |
| 431 | the giant panda | 637 | 898 | 18.21 | 71% |
| 432 | reintroductions | 1,014 | 1,566 | 18.2 | 65% |
| 433 | passive restoration | 334 | 374 | 18.2 | 89% |
| 434 | tropical biology | 538 | 725 | 18.2 | 74% |
| 435 | restoration practices | 635 | 898 | 18.2 | 71% |
| 436 | forest governance | 700 | 1,014 | 18.2 | 69% |
| 437 | endangered primate | 321 | 355 | 18.19 | 90% |
| 438 | acipenser transmontanus | 431 | 541 | 18.19 | 80% |
| 439 | threat status | 505 | 671 | 18.19 | 75% |
| 440 | forest landscape restoration | 312 | 341 | 18.19 | 91% |
| 441 | trophy hunting | 376 | 448 | 18.19 | 84% |
| 442 | leopards | 972 | 1,506 | 18.19 | 65% |
| 443 | forest ecosystem service | 638 | 910 | 18.19 | 70% |
| 444 | conservation decisions | 747 | 1,106 | 18.19 | 68% |
| 445 | human-wildlife | 1,540 | 2,491 | 18.19 | 62% |
| 446 | reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (redd+) | 303 | 328 | 18.18 | 92% |
| 447 | convention on international trade in endangered species of wild fauna and flora | 365 | 431 | 18.18 | 85% |
| 448 | agenda 21 | 859 | 1,309 | 18.18 | 66% |
| 449 | soil phytoremediation | 307 | 335 | 18.18 | 92% |
| 450 | forest loss | 1,460 | 2,364 | 18.18 | 62% |
| 451 | red-list | 733 | 1,086 | 18.18 | 67% |
| 452 | ratio-dependent predator-prey | 286 | 302 | 18.18 | 95% |
| 453 | conservation objective | 992 | 1,552 | 18.18 | 64% |
| 454 | neogobius | 642 | 924 | 18.18 | 69% |
| 455 | water bioremediation | 364 | 432 | 18.17 | 84% |
| 456 | conifer plantations | 430 | 546 | 18.17 | 79% |
| 457 | afforestation program | 427 | 541 | 18.17 | 79% |
| 458 | enemy release hypothesis | 324 | 365 | 18.17 | 89% |
| 459 | species control | 610 | 868 | 18.17 | 70% |
| 460 | conservation initiatives | 1,088 | 1,729 | 18.17 | 63% |
| 461 | least concern | 1,059 | 1,678 | 18.17 | 63% |
| 462 | lycaon pictus | 367 | 440 | 18.16 | 83% |
| 463 | regional conservation | 560 | 782 | 18.16 | 72% |
| 464 | acipenser sinensis | 268 | 276 | 18.16 | 97% |
| 465 | recovery of vegetation | 308 | 341 | 18.16 | 90% |
| 466 | camelus bactrianus | 314 | 351 | 18.16 | 89% |
| 467 | conservation objectives | 916 | 1,429 | 18.16 | 64% |
| 468 | climate finance | 602 | 859 | 18.16 | 70% |
| 469 | restoration project | 4,221 | 6,504 | 18.16 | 65% |
| 470 | restoration program | 1,682 | 2,767 | 18.16 | 61% |
| 471 | giant pandas | 604 | 864 | 18.16 | 70% |
| 472 | wolf population | 586 | 832 | 18.16 | 70% |
| 473 | restoration activities | 928 | 1,455 | 18.16 | 64% |
| 474 | restoration actions | 657 | 962 | 18.16 | 68% |
| 475 | metal phytoremediation | 331 | 381 | 18.16 | 87% |
| 476 | ecological conservation | 1,007 | 1,598 | 18.16 | 63% |
| 477 | threat to biodiversity | 833 | 1,284 | 18.15 | 65% |
| 478 | rangifer tarandus caribou | 340 | 397 | 18.15 | 86% |
| 479 | human-dominated landscape | 726 | 1,090 | 18.15 | 67% |
| 480 | reforestation programs | 337 | 392 | 18.15 | 86% |
| 481 | invasive predators | 307 | 342 | 18.15 | 90% |
| 482 | forest management system | 351 | 417 | 18.15 | 84% |
| 483 | endangered orchid | 289 | 313 | 18.15 | 92% |
| 484 | protected area network | 643 | 942 | 18.15 | 68% |
| 485 | forest ecosystem services | 583 | 835 | 18.14 | 70% |
| 486 | invasive tree species | 269 | 282 | 18.14 | 95% |
| 487 | conservation tool | 916 | 1,449 | 18.14 | 63% |
| 488 | camera-trap | 895 | 1,412 | 18.14 | 63% |
| 489 | rare and endangered plant | 313 | 356 | 18.13 | 88% |
| 490 | emerald ash borer (eab) | 267 | 280 | 18.13 | 95% |
| 491 | active restoration | 530 | 742 | 18.13 | 71% |
| 492 | bioremediation agent | 373 | 460 | 18.13 | 81% |
| 493 | conservation plan | 8,627 | 11,635 | 18.13 | 74% |
| 494 | threats to biodiversity | 795 | 1,232 | 18.13 | 65% |
| 495 | native and non-native species | 320 | 369 | 18.13 | 87% |
| 496 | pan troglodytes schweinfurthii | 307 | 347 | 18.13 | 88% |
| 497 | restoration treatments | 524 | 733 | 18.13 | 71% |
| 498 | endangered wildlife | 339 | 402 | 18.13 | 84% |
| 499 | conservation assessments | 480 | 653 | 18.13 | 74% |
| 500 | plant invaders | 270 | 286 | 18.13 | 94% |
| 501 | phytoextraction efficiency | 290 | 319 | 18.13 | 91% |
| 502 | camera trapping | 888 | 1,408 | 18.13 | 63% |
| 503 | phytostabilisation | 273 | 292 | 18.12 | 93% |
| 505 | u.s. endangered species act | 358 | 437 | 18.12 | 82% |
| 506 | western lowland gorilla | 380 | 476 | 18.12 | 80% |
| 507 | nonnative plant | 286 | 314 | 18.12 | 91% |
| 508 | conservation area | 3,955 | 6,280 | 18.12 | 63% |
| 509 | conservation policy | 1,723 | 2,901 | 18.12 | 59% |
| 510 | native tree species | 1,024 | 1,669 | 18.11 | 61% |
| 511 | extinction probabilities | 375 | 469 | 18.11 | 80% |
| 512 | conservation of endangered species | 354 | 432 | 18.11 | 82% |
| 513 | illegal harvest | 276 | 299 | 18.11 | 92% |
| 514 | invaded ecosystems | 316 | 367 | 18.11 | 86% |
| 515 | ex situ conservation | 1,559 | 2,632 | 18.11 | 59% |
| 516 | captive breeding | 1,670 | 2,826 | 18.11 | 59% |
| 517 | extinction rate | 1,484 | 2,505 | 18.11 | 59% |
| 518 | community forestry | 788 | 1,238 | 18.1 | 64% |
| 519 | butterfly conservation | 293 | 329 | 18.1 | 89% |
| 520 | native plant communities | 527 | 750 | 18.1 | 70% |
| 521 | rhinella marina | 424 | 561 | 18.1 | 76% |
| 522 | forest policy | 1,441 | 2,435 | 18.1 | 59% |
| 523 | asian elephant (elephas maximus) | 296 | 335 | 18.1 | 88% |
| 524 | snub-nosed monkeys | 274 | 298 | 18.1 | 92% |
| 525 | alien tree | 330 | 394 | 18.1 | 84% |
| 526 | protected forest | 846 | 1,352 | 18.1 | 63% |
| 527 | degraded ecosystem | 721 | 1,117 | 18.1 | 65% |
| 528 | tapirus | 427 | 568 | 18.1 | 75% |
| 529 | conservation reserve program | 600 | 890 | 18.1 | 67% |
| 530 | extent of occurrence | 458 | 626 | 18.09 | 73% |
| 531 | conservation management | 4,888 | 7,593 | 18.09 | 64% |
| 532 | water conservation measures | 677 | 1,037 | 18.09 | 65% |
| 533 | conservation biology | 3,749 | 6,076 | 18.09 | 62% |
| 534 | international union for the conservation of nature | 405 | 530 | 18.09 | 76% |
| 535 | listed species | 809 | 1,288 | 18.09 | 63% |
| 536 | managed forests | 1,366 | 2,319 | 18.09 | 59% |
| 537 | invest model | 561 | 822 | 18.09 | 68% |
| 538 | chimpanzee (pan troglodytes) | 433 | 583 | 18.09 | 74% |
| 539 | forest management regime | 262 | 281 | 18.08 | 93% |
| 540 | logged forest | 734 | 1,153 | 18.08 | 64% |
| 541 | native predator | 625 | 947 | 18.08 | 66% |
| 542 | non-native fish | 530 | 767 | 18.08 | 69% |
| 543 | ecosystem conservation | 731 | 1,149 | 18.08 | 64% |
| 544 | invasive species control | 288 | 326 | 18.08 | 88% |
| 545 | non-timber forest products | 1,023 | 1,702 | 18.08 | 60% |
| 546 | zebra mussels (dreissena polymorpha) | 326 | 393 | 18.07 | 83% |
| 547 | habitat degradation | 2,190 | 3,758 | 18.07 | 58% |
| 548 | woodland caribou | 365 | 463 | 18.07 | 79% |
| 549 | conservation threat | 452 | 623 | 18.07 | 73% |
| 550 | restoration plan | 1,699 | 2,931 | 18.07 | 58% |
| 551 | soil conservation service | 1,063 | 1,784 | 18.07 | 60% |
| 552 | managed forest | 2,141 | 3,687 | 18.07 | 58% |
| 553 | soil conservation service curve number | 293 | 337 | 18.07 | 87% |
| 554 | african wild dog | 351 | 440 | 18.07 | 80% |
| 555 | threatened status | 349 | 437 | 18.06 | 80% |
| 556 | combat desertification | 395 | 521 | 18.06 | 76% |
| 557 | invaded communities | 286 | 326 | 18.06 | 88% |
| 558 | international union for conservation of nature (iucn) red list | 245 | 257 | 18.06 | 95% |
| 559 | rhinopithecus roxellana | 267 | 294 | 18.06 | 91% |
| 560 | human-dominated landscapes | 574 | 860 | 18.06 | 67% |
| 561 | restoration planning | 572 | 858 | 18.06 | 67% |
| 562 | tree plantations | 1,175 | 2,008 | 18.06 | 59% |
| 563 | red-listed | 589 | 891 | 18.06 | 66% |
| 564 | wildlife management area | 381 | 498 | 18.05 | 77% |
| 565 | afforestation project | 305 | 361 | 18.05 | 84% |
| 566 | grassland restoration | 665 | 1,040 | 18.05 | 64% |
| 567 | endangered animals | 321 | 390 | 18.05 | 82% |
| 568 | forest remnants | 912 | 1,516 | 18.05 | 60% |
| 570 | the giant panda (ailuropoda melanoleuca) | 242 | 254 | 18.05 | 95% |
| 571 | alien plant invasion | 278 | 315 | 18.05 | 88% |
| 572 | forest plan | 5,110 | 8,049 | 18.05 | 63% |
| 573 | afforestation and reforestation | 279 | 317 | 18.05 | 88% |
| 574 | non-timber forest product | 1,176 | 2,020 | 18.05 | 58% |
| 575 | diceros bicornis | 354 | 451 | 18.05 | 78% |
| 576 | freshwater biodiversity | 644 | 1,003 | 18.05 | 64% |
| 577 | conservation status assessment | 248 | 265 | 18.04 | 94% |
| 578 | production forest | 654 | 1,024 | 18.04 | 64% |
| 579 | invasive and native species | 243 | 257 | 18.04 | 95% |
| 580 | deforestation rate | 760 | 1,232 | 18.04 | 62% |
| 581 | priority conservation area | 312 | 377 | 18.04 | 83% |
| 582 | pet trade | 600 | 922 | 18.04 | 65% |
| 583 | intensive forest management | 300 | 356 | 18.04 | 84% |
| 584 | pan troglodytes verus | 276 | 314 | 18.04 | 88% |
| 585 | conservation interest | 688 | 1,094 | 18.04 | 63% |
| 586 | habitat destruction | 1,890 | 3,322 | 18.04 | 57% |
| 587 | camera trap | 2,613 | 4,533 | 18.03 | 58% |
| 588 | economic valuation | 1,682 | 2,963 | 18.03 | 57% |
| 589 | total economic value | 442 | 620 | 18.03 | 71% |
| 590 | degraded forest | 821 | 1,356 | 18.03 | 61% |
| 591 | biodiversity value | 726 | 1,171 | 18.03 | 62% |
| 592 | natural restoration | 465 | 664 | 18.03 | 70% |
| 593 | captive breeding program | 510 | 751 | 18.03 | 68% |
| 594 | iucn conservation status | 234 | 244 | 18.03 | 96% |
| 595 | conservation easement | 388 | 519 | 18.03 | 75% |
| 596 | bioremediation technology | 348 | 445 | 18.03 | 78% |
| 597 | freshwater management | 272 | 309 | 18.03 | 88% |
| 598 | habitat suitability model | 875 | 1,465 | 18.03 | 60% |
| 599 | modified landscape | 766 | 1,253 | 18.03 | 61% |
| 600 | sustainable forest management (sfm) | 273 | 311 | 18.03 | 88% |
| 601 | forest use | 1,076 | 1,854 | 18.03 | 58% |
| 602 | landscape connectivity | 1,179 | 2,050 | 18.03 | 58% |
| 603 | conservation activities | 983 | 1,676 | 18.03 | 59% |
| 604 | forest ecosystem management | 256 | 282 | 18.03 | 91% |
| 605 | bioremediation system | 305 | 368 | 18.03 | 83% |
| 606 | native ecosystem | 791 | 1,304 | 18.02 | 61% |
| 607 | contingent valuation method | 1,579 | 2,792 | 18.02 | 57% |
| 609 | habitat protection | 727 | 1,180 | 18.02 | 62% |
| 610 | priority areas for conservation | 362 | 473 | 18.02 | 77% |
| 611 | community-based conservation | 522 | 779 | 18.02 | 67% |
| 612 | native predators | 428 | 598 | 18.02 | 72% |
| 613 | degraded ecosystems | 554 | 842 | 18.02 | 66% |
| 614 | lycaon | 453 | 646 | 18.02 | 70% |
| 615 | dikerogammarus villosus | 237 | 251 | 18.02 | 94% |
| 616 | participatory forest management | 258 | 287 | 18.02 | 90% |
| 617 | leopard (panthera pardus) | 251 | 275 | 18.02 | 91% |
| 618 | wildlife forensic | 262 | 294 | 18.02 | 89% |
| 619 | exotic species invasion | 256 | 284 | 18.02 | 90% |
| 620 | invasive insect pest | 253 | 279 | 18.01 | 91% |
| 621 | epithem | 590 | 916 | 18.01 | 64% |
| 622 | rio 2016 | 258 | 288 | 18.01 | 90% |
| 623 | chrysocyon brachyurus | 242 | 261 | 18.01 | 93% |
| 624 | introduced populations | 927 | 1,582 | 18.01 | 59% |
| 625 | native ecosystems | 643 | 1,023 | 18.01 | 63% |
| 626 | timber forest | 1,551 | 2,764 | 18.01 | 56% |
| 627 | habitat connectivity | 918 | 1,569 | 18.01 | 59% |
| 628 | species habitat | 982 | 1,695 | 18 | 58% |
| 629 | non-timber | 1,524 | 2,723 | 18 | 56% |
| 630 | conservation policies | 1,732 | 3,102 | 18 | 56% |
| 631 | marxan | 354 | 464 | 18 | 76% |
| 632 | imperiled species | 403 | 557 | 18 | 72% |
| 633 | modified landscapes | 614 | 971 | 18 | 63% |
| 634 | invasive mammal | 286 | 340 | 18 | 84% |
| 635 | ecosystem service valuation | 246 | 270 | 18 | 91% |
| 636 | invasive fish species | 264 | 302 | 17.99 | 87% |
| 637 | tree plantation | 1,490 | 2,675 | 17.99 | 56% |
| 638 | dikerogammarus | 278 | 327 | 17.99 | 85% |
| 639 | grain for green | 517 | 783 | 17.99 | 66% |
| 640 | urban forest management | 236 | 254 | 17.99 | 93% |
| 641 | fragmented landscapes | 1,212 | 2,157 | 17.99 | 56% |
| 642 | community-based forest management | 245 | 270 | 17.99 | 91% |
| 643 | invasion history | 455 | 663 | 17.99 | 69% |
| 644 | globally threatened species | 242 | 265 | 17.99 | 91% |
| 645 | conservation strategy | 1,939 | 3,499 | 17.99 | 55% |
| 646 | ecology and conservation | 1,084 | 1,913 | 17.99 | 57% |
| 647 | chrysocyon | 244 | 269 | 17.98 | 91% |
| 648 | management of invasive species | 278 | 329 | 17.98 | 84% |
| 649 | round gobies | 241 | 264 | 17.98 | 91% |
| 650 | strategy framework | 973 | 1,699 | 17.98 | 57% |
| 651 | reforestation projects | 254 | 287 | 17.98 | 89% |
| 652 | conservation reserve program (crp) | 380 | 520 | 17.98 | 73% |
| 653 | ecological restoration program | 236 | 256 | 17.98 | 92% |
| 654 | trichechus manatus latirostris | 233 | 251 | 17.98 | 93% |
| 655 | diversity conservation | 16,657 | 19,762 | 17.98 | 84% |
| 656 | jaguars | 456 | 669 | 17.98 | 68% |
| 657 | invasives | 535 | 826 | 17.98 | 65% |
| 658 | pards | 972 | 1,702 | 17.98 | 57% |
| 659 | native fishes | 720 | 1,199 | 17.98 | 60% |
| 661 | invasive insects | 255 | 290 | 17.98 | 88% |
| 662 | white sturgeon | 418 | 596 | 17.98 | 70% |
| 663 | forest remnant | 1,141 | 2,037 | 17.97 | 56% |
| 664 | bushmeat hunting | 220 | 230 | 17.97 | 96% |
| 665 | human-dominated | 1,076 | 1,912 | 17.97 | 56% |
| 666 | land protection | 1,227 | 2,209 | 17.97 | 56% |
| 667 | native and introduced ranges | 243 | 270 | 17.97 | 90% |
| 668 | native forests | 1,051 | 1,868 | 17.97 | 56% |
| 669 | charadrius melodus | 227 | 243 | 17.97 | 93% |
| 670 | forest fragments | 2,145 | 3,901 | 17.97 | 55% |
| 671 | conservation practitioners | 491 | 744 | 17.97 | 66% |
| 672 | saproxylic | 756 | 1,279 | 17.97 | 59% |
| 673 | camera traps | 1,532 | 2,795 | 17.97 | 55% |
| 674 | piping plover | 251 | 285 | 17.96 | 88% |
| 675 | in situ conservation | 975 | 1,721 | 17.96 | 57% |
| 676 | conservation benefit | 681 | 1,129 | 17.96 | 60% |
| 677 | introduced population | 1,265 | 2,291 | 17.96 | 55% |
| 678 | habitat loss | 6,960 | 10,720 | 17.96 | 65% |
| 679 | remediation efficiency | 928 | 1,630 | 17.96 | 57% |
| 680 | conservation effectiveness | 330 | 431 | 17.96 | 77% |
| 681 | faunal extinction | 322 | 416 | 17.96 | 77% |
| 682 | conservation investment | 323 | 418 | 17.96 | 77% |
| 683 | wild fauna | 585 | 937 | 17.96 | 62% |
| 684 | wildlife conflicts | 594 | 956 | 17.96 | 62% |
| 685 | msfd | 483 | 732 | 17.96 | 66% |
| 686 | anaerobic bioremediation | 239 | 266 | 17.95 | 90% |
| 687 | native tree | 2,101 | 3,852 | 17.95 | 55% |
| 688 | jaguar (panthera onca) | 232 | 254 | 17.95 | 91% |
| 689 | lowland gorilla | 444 | 657 | 17.95 | 68% |
| 690 | panthera tigris altaica | 223 | 239 | 17.95 | 93% |
| 691 | remediation plan | 926 | 1,637 | 17.95 | 57% |
| 692 | forest patches | 1,716 | 3,168 | 17.95 | 54% |
| 693 | degraded land | 1,612 | 2,975 | 17.95 | 54% |
| 694 | native plants | 3,202 | 5,698 | 17.95 | 56% |
| 695 | gray wolves | 409 | 589 | 17.95 | 69% |
| 696 | restoration planting | 264 | 312 | 17.95 | 85% |
| 697 | restoration strategies | 1,039 | 1,869 | 17.94 | 56% |
| 698 | primate conservation | 272 | 327 | 17.94 | 83% |
| 699 | livestock depredation | 341 | 457 | 17.94 | 75% |
| 700 | private lands | 763 | 1,311 | 17.94 | 58% |
| 701 | caiman latirostris | 220 | 235 | 17.94 | 94% |
| 702 | wild chimpanzee | 575 | 927 | 17.94 | 62% |
| 703 | priority conservation areas | 276 | 335 | 17.94 | 82% |
| 704 | imperiled | 1,437 | 2,655 | 17.94 | 54% |
| 705 | introduced predator | 551 | 879 | 17.94 | 63% |
| 706 | human-modified | 858 | 1,509 | 17.94 | 57% |
| 707 | degraded lands | 1,004 | 1,807 | 17.94 | 56% |
| 708 | human-modified landscape | 468 | 712 | 17.94 | 66% |
| 709 | forest landscapes | 1,124 | 2,049 | 17.94 | 55% |
| 710 | exotic grass | 487 | 751 | 17.93 | 65% |
| 711 | megafaunal extinction | 252 | 293 | 17.93 | 86% |
| 712 | contingent valuation method (cvm) | 519 | 817 | 17.93 | 64% |
| 713 | native range | 3,208 | 5,750 | 17.93 | 56% |
| 714 | community conservation | 457 | 691 | 17.93 | 66% |
| 715 | priority species | 437 | 651 | 17.93 | 67% |
| 716 | conservation landscape | 336 | 451 | 17.93 | 75% |
| 717 | system restoration | 2,535 | 4,659 | 17.93 | 54% |
| 718 | crocodylus porosus | 312 | 406 | 17.93 | 77% |
| 719 | heavy metal phytoremediation | 248 | 287 | 17.93 | 86% |
| 720 | natura 2000 area | 215 | 229 | 17.93 | 94% |
| 721 | forest owners | 1,167 | 2,147 | 17.92 | 54% |
| 722 | conservation intervention | 706 | 1,208 | 17.92 | 58% |
| 723 | forest managers | 1,480 | 2,761 | 17.92 | 54% |
| 724 | stages of invasion | 276 | 339 | 17.92 | 81% |
| 725 | population extinction | 628 | 1,047 | 17.92 | 60% |
| 726 | native invasive species | 238 | 270 | 17.92 | 88% |
| 727 | exotic tree | 644 | 1,081 | 17.92 | 60% |
| 728 | deforestation rates | 541 | 869 | 17.92 | 62% |
| 729 | social and environmental accounting | 245 | 283 | 17.92 | 87% |
| 730 | strategy frame | 973 | 1,763 | 17.92 | 55% |
| 731 | forest reserves | 754 | 1,312 | 17.92 | 57% |
| 732 | wildlife crime | 286 | 359 | 17.92 | 80% |
| 733 | mammal conservation | 233 | 262 | 17.92 | 89% |
| 734 | translocation factor (tf) | 477 | 739 | 17.92 | 65% |
| 735 | tropical forest restoration | 222 | 243 | 17.91 | 91% |
| 736 | joint forest management | 269 | 328 | 17.91 | 82% |
| 737 | saproxylic beetle | 452 | 689 | 17.91 | 66% |
| 738 | threatened taxa | 310 | 406 | 17.91 | 76% |
| 739 | life management | 4,088 | 7,159 | 17.91 | 57% |
| 740 | endangered subspecies | 220 | 240 | 17.91 | 92% |
| 741 | tapirus terrestris | 230 | 258 | 17.91 | 89% |
| 742 | long-term conservation | 1,159 | 2,150 | 17.91 | 54% |
| 743 | exotic invasive species | 226 | 251 | 17.91 | 90% |
| 744 | community forests | 429 | 644 | 17.91 | 67% |
| 745 | restoration target | 364 | 513 | 17.91 | 71% |
| 746 | forest management regimes | 205 | 215 | 17.91 | 95% |
| 747 | conservation easements | 312 | 412 | 17.9 | 76% |
| 748 | forest fragmentation | 1,820 | 3,437 | 17.9 | 53% |
| 749 | forest owner | 1,258 | 2,355 | 17.9 | 53% |
| 750 | secondary forests | 1,535 | 2,902 | 17.9 | 53% |
| 751 | nonindigenous species | 400 | 588 | 17.9 | 68% |
| 752 | forest specialist | 501 | 796 | 17.9 | 63% |
| 753 | vulnerable species | 1,133 | 2,108 | 17.9 | 54% |
| 754 | conservation benefits | 578 | 957 | 17.9 | 60% |
| 755 | conservation function | 377 | 542 | 17.9 | 70% |
| 756 | millennium ecosystem assessment | 393 | 575 | 17.9 | 68% |
| 757 | conservation efforts | 7,353 | 11,520 | 17.9 | 64% |
| 758 | bioremediation technique | 376 | 541 | 17.9 | 70% |
| 759 | nagoya protocol | 314 | 418 | 17.9 | 75% |
| 760 | restoration outcomes | 347 | 483 | 17.9 | 72% |
| 761 | biodiversity and ecosystem services | 972 | 1,783 | 17.9 | 55% |
| 762 | forest landscape | 2,630 | 4,900 | 17.9 | 54% |
| 763 | invasive weed optimization algorithm | 232 | 264 | 17.9 | 88% |
| 764 | drivers of deforestation | 228 | 257 | 17.9 | 89% |
| 765 | wildlife managers | 791 | 1,408 | 17.89 | 56% |
| 766 | avoided deforestation | 239 | 277 | 17.89 | 86% |
| 767 | sustainable ecosystem management | 220 | 243 | 17.89 | 91% |
| 768 | global biodiversity | 2,353 | 4,429 | 17.89 | 53% |
| 769 | forest patch | 1,989 | 3,775 | 17.89 | 53% |
| 770 | rare and threatened species | 242 | 283 | 17.89 | 86% |
| 771 | extinction of species | 424 | 641 | 17.89 | 66% |
| 773 | habitat loss and degradation | 354 | 499 | 17.89 | 71% |
| 774 | ecosystem services valuation | 232 | 265 | 17.89 | 88% |
| 775 | large-scale restoration | 294 | 381 | 17.89 | 77% |
| 776 | conservation genetics | 1,902 | 3,617 | 17.89 | 53% |
| 777 | phytoremediation technology | 283 | 360 | 17.89 | 79% |
| 778 | declining species | 486 | 770 | 17.89 | 63% |
| 779 | protected areas | 3,442 | 6,250 | 17.89 | 55% |
| 780 | alien invasive plant | 223 | 249 | 17.89 | 90% |
| 781 | threatening processes | 319 | 430 | 17.89 | 74% |
| 782 | forest cover change | 620 | 1,052 | 17.89 | 59% |
| 783 | desertification processes | 299 | 391 | 17.89 | 76% |
| 784 | camera-trapping | 401 | 595 | 17.89 | 67% |
| 785 | restoration management | 356 | 504 | 17.89 | 71% |
| 786 | protected forests | 385 | 563 | 17.89 | 68% |
| 787 | diversity and conservation | 659 | 1,137 | 17.89 | 58% |
| 788 | grassland bird | 570 | 949 | 17.88 | 60% |
| 789 | conservation practices | 2,427 | 4,577 | 17.88 | 53% |
| 790 | colonization and extinction | 288 | 372 | 17.88 | 77% |
| 791 | combating desertification | 250 | 300 | 17.88 | 83% |
| 792 | local agenda 21 | 292 | 380 | 17.88 | 77% |
| 793 | adaptive forest management | 202 | 214 | 17.88 | 94% |
| 794 | redds | 380 | 556 | 17.88 | 68% |
| 795 | freshwater conservation | 224 | 253 | 17.88 | 89% |
| 796 | wild chimpanzees | 505 | 817 | 17.88 | 62% |
| 797 | aichi targets | 216 | 239 | 17.88 | 90% |
| 798 | conservation perspective | 463 | 729 | 17.87 | 64% |
| 799 | conservation interventions | 560 | 935 | 17.87 | 60% |
| 800 | grizzly | 728 | 1,296 | 17.87 | 56% |
| 801 | the wildlife society | 1,317 | 2,523 | 17.87 | 52% |
| 802 | habitat requirements | 2,052 | 3,946 | 17.87 | 52% |
| 803 | restoration outcome | 378 | 557 | 17.86 | 68% |
| 804 | gorilla beringei | 264 | 330 | 17.86 | 80% |
| 805 | stream restoration | 808 | 1,472 | 17.86 | 55% |
| 806 | federally threatened | 309 | 418 | 17.86 | 74% |
| 807 | metal phytoextraction | 196 | 206 | 17.86 | 95% |
| 808 | beringei | 284 | 369 | 17.86 | 77% |
| 809 | production forests | 340 | 481 | 17.86 | 71% |
| 810 | native trees | 803 | 1,464 | 17.86 | 55% |
| 811 | western lowland gorillas | 264 | 331 | 17.86 | 80% |
| 812 | habitat requirement | 2,109 | 4,067 | 17.86 | 52% |
| 813 | riparian restoration | 292 | 386 | 17.86 | 76% |
| 814 | conservation and restoration | 1,883 | 3,650 | 17.86 | 52% |
| 815 | conservation effort | 7,694 | 12,158 | 17.86 | 63% |
| 816 | reintroduction program | 492 | 800 | 17.85 | 62% |
| 817 | spatial conservation | 356 | 515 | 17.85 | 69% |
| 818 | native fauna | 600 | 1,032 | 17.85 | 58% |
| 819 | threatening process | 408 | 623 | 17.85 | 65% |
| 820 | cites appendix i | 205 | 223 | 17.85 | 92% |
| 821 | ecological remediation | 255 | 315 | 17.85 | 81% |
| 822 | conservation of threatened species | 210 | 232 | 17.85 | 91% |
| 823 | threatened birds | 215 | 241 | 17.85 | 89% |
| 824 | degraded forests | 359 | 522 | 17.85 | 69% |
| 825 | connectivity conservation | 334 | 471 | 17.85 | 71% |
| 826 | species restoration | 272 | 348 | 17.85 | 78% |
| 827 | potential habitat | 1,019 | 1,930 | 17.85 | 53% |
| 828 | ycao | 453 | 719 | 17.85 | 63% |
| 829 | saproxylic beetles | 379 | 564 | 17.85 | 67% |
| 830 | forest management and conservation | 213 | 238 | 17.85 | 89% |
| 831 | human-modified landscapes | 396 | 600 | 17.85 | 66% |
| 832 | crocodylus | 748 | 1,355 | 17.85 | 55% |
| 833 | weed optimization algorithm | 239 | 286 | 17.85 | 84% |
| 834 | conservation resources | 308 | 420 | 17.85 | 73% |
| 835 | restoration potential | 360 | 526 | 17.85 | 68% |
| 836 | diceros | 359 | 524 | 17.85 | 69% |
| 837 | payments for ecosystem services | 632 | 1,106 | 17.85 | 57% |
| 838 | spheniscus demersus | 278 | 361 | 17.85 | 77% |
| 839 | puma concolor | 712 | 1,280 | 17.84 | 56% |
| 840 | natural forests | 2,198 | 4,263 | 17.84 | 52% |
| 841 | timber production | 1,558 | 3,046 | 17.84 | 51% |
| 842 | non-native tree | 295 | 396 | 17.84 | 74% |
| 843 | conservation challenges | 437 | 690 | 17.84 | 63% |
| 844 | species persistence | 657 | 1,165 | 17.84 | 56% |
| 845 | aichi biodiversity target | 209 | 233 | 17.84 | 90% |
| 846 | biodiversity conservation planning | 200 | 217 | 17.83 | 92% |
| 847 | exotic species | 5,174 | 9,033 | 17.83 | 57% |
| 848 | biodiversity hotspots | 1,352 | 2,643 | 17.83 | 51% |
| 849 | soil and water conservation (swc) | 211 | 237 | 17.83 | 89% |
| 850 | exotic specie | 5,177 | 9,044 | 17.83 | 57% |
| 851 | intact forest | 563 | 965 | 17.83 | 58% |
| 852 | translocation factor | 1,329 | 2,600 | 17.83 | 51% |
| 853 | private forest | 1,050 | 2,019 | 17.83 | 52% |
| 854 | native forest | 3,003 | 5,716 | 17.83 | 53% |
| 855 | species introductions | 540 | 917 | 17.83 | 59% |
| 856 | fragmented landscape | 1,796 | 3,535 | 17.83 | 51% |
| 857 | research and conservation | 687 | 1,238 | 17.83 | 55% |
| 858 | conservation significance | 343 | 497 | 17.83 | 69% |
| 859 | suitable habitats | 1,677 | 3,306 | 17.83 | 51% |
| 860 | assisted phytoextraction | 192 | 204 | 17.83 | 94% |
| 861 | remnant forest | 417 | 653 | 17.83 | 64% |
| 862 | convention on international trade in endangered species of wild fauna and flora (cites) | 232 | 277 | 17.83 | 84% |
| 863 | degraded habitat | 447 | 718 | 17.82 | 62% |
| 864 | captive chimpanzee | 376 | 567 | 17.82 | 66% |
| 865 | restored habitat | 240 | 293 | 17.82 | 82% |
| 866 | extinction dynamics | 287 | 385 | 17.82 | 75% |
| 867 | conservation strategies | 6,196 | 10,484 | 17.82 | 59% |
| 868 | forest sustainability | 345 | 504 | 17.82 | 68% |
| 869 | endemic bird | 422 | 668 | 17.82 | 63% |
| 870 | iucn red list assessment | 190 | 202 | 17.82 | 94% |
| 871 | conservation organization | 548 | 942 | 17.82 | 58% |
| 872 | soil and water conservation practices | 261 | 335 | 17.81 | 78% |
| 873 | habitat patches | 1,770 | 3,512 | 17.81 | 50% |
| 874 | integrated valuation of ecosystem services and tradeoffs (invest) | 180 | 185 | 17.81 | 97% |
| 875 | conservation needs | 590 | 1,036 | 17.81 | 57% |
| 876 | iucn category | 202 | 224 | 17.81 | 90% |
| 878 | conservation organizations | 475 | 785 | 17.81 | 61% |
| 879 | endangered specie | 18,865 | 23,076 | 17.81 | 82% |
| 880 | african penguin | 244 | 303 | 17.81 | 81% |
| 881 | mangrove restoration | 296 | 406 | 17.81 | 73% |
| 882 | introduced predators | 410 | 645 | 17.81 | 64% |
| 883 | invasive exotic species | 205 | 230 | 17.81 | 89% |
| 884 | forest planning | 792 | 1,484 | 17.81 | 53% |
| 885 | bioremediation efficiency | 206 | 232 | 17.81 | 89% |
| 886 | ecosystem services (ess) | 476 | 789 | 17.81 | 60% |
| 887 | wild dog | 523 | 892 | 17.81 | 59% |
| 888 | habitat network | 297 | 409 | 17.81 | 73% |
| 889 | native and introduced species | 230 | 277 | 17.81 | 83% |
| 890 | remnant populations | 426 | 681 | 17.81 | 63% |
| 891 | land degradation and desertification | 222 | 262 | 17.81 | 85% |
| 892 | invasive ant species | 188 | 200 | 17.81 | 94% |
| 893 | cheetahs | 465 | 766 | 17.81 | 61% |
| 894 | red list assessments | 198 | 218 | 17.8 | 91% |
| 895 | habitat fragmentation | 4,745 | 8,548 | 17.8 | 56% |
| 896 | diversity hotspots | 1,478 | 2,947 | 17.8 | 50% |
| 897 | bird diversity | 877 | 1,677 | 17.8 | 52% |
| 898 | conservation gap | 230 | 278 | 17.8 | 83% |
| 899 | conservation ecology | 497 | 839 | 17.8 | 59% |
| 900 | non-market valuation | 381 | 587 | 17.8 | 65% |
| 901 | conservation practice | 3,066 | 5,920 | 17.8 | 52% |
| 902 | anthropogenic habitat | 696 | 1,283 | 17.79 | 54% |
| 903 | wolves | 3,119 | 6,020 | 17.79 | 52% |
| 904 | anti-poaching | 234 | 287 | 17.79 | 82% |
| 905 | habitat fragment | 4,930 | 8,861 | 17.79 | 56% |
| 906 | agri-environment scheme | 578 | 1,022 | 17.79 | 57% |
| 907 | forest code | 265 | 348 | 17.79 | 76% |
| 908 | endangered bird species | 203 | 229 | 17.79 | 89% |
| 909 | restored forest | 240 | 299 | 17.79 | 80% |
| 910 | invasive trees | 188 | 202 | 17.79 | 93% |
| 911 | ntfp | 691 | 1,275 | 17.79 | 54% |
| 912 | threatened bird species | 205 | 233 | 17.79 | 88% |
| 913 | population viability analysis (pva) | 251 | 321 | 17.79 | 78% |
| 914 | red list status | 213 | 248 | 17.79 | 86% |
| 915 | invasive plant management | 206 | 235 | 17.79 | 88% |
| 916 | african wild dogs | 235 | 290 | 17.79 | 81% |
| 917 | restoration treatment | 589 | 1,050 | 17.79 | 56% |
| 918 | fragmented habitat | 712 | 1,325 | 17.79 | 54% |
| 919 | habitat area | 1,103 | 2,185 | 17.79 | 50% |
| 920 | cheetah (acinonyx jubatus) | 212 | 247 | 17.78 | 86% |
| 921 | forest policies | 414 | 665 | 17.78 | 62% |
| 922 | scaphirhynchus albus | 177 | 184 | 17.78 | 96% |
| 923 | habitat suitability | 3,847 | 7,267 | 17.78 | 53% |
| 924 | benefit sharing | 745 | 1,404 | 17.78 | 53% |
| 925 | introduced plant | 614 | 1,111 | 17.78 | 55% |
| 926 | grassland birds | 443 | 730 | 17.78 | 61% |
| 927 | species introduction | 871 | 1,686 | 17.78 | 52% |
| 928 | occupancy model | 1,415 | 2,859 | 17.78 | 49% |
| 929 | predator control | 532 | 929 | 17.78 | 57% |
| 930 | fragmented forest | 666 | 1,230 | 17.78 | 54% |
| 931 | priority habitat | 271 | 365 | 17.77 | 74% |
| 932 | human-wildlife conflicts | 426 | 696 | 17.77 | 61% |
| 933 | endangered amphibian | 178 | 187 | 17.77 | 95% |
| 934 | environmental bioremediation | 258 | 339 | 17.77 | 76% |
| 935 | restoration plantings | 199 | 225 | 17.77 | 88% |
| 936 | ecological corridor | 673 | 1,250 | 17.77 | 54% |
| 937 | chinese sturgeon | 269 | 362 | 17.77 | 74% |
| 938 | in-situ bioremediation | 239 | 302 | 17.77 | 79% |
| 939 | suitability model | 1,040 | 2,071 | 17.77 | 50% |
| 940 | black rhino | 355 | 543 | 17.77 | 65% |
| 941 | restoration of degraded land | 224 | 273 | 17.77 | 82% |
| 942 | endemic and threatened species | 186 | 202 | 17.77 | 92% |
| 943 | restoration targets | 277 | 379 | 17.76 | 73% |
| 944 | lowland gorillas | 313 | 454 | 17.76 | 69% |
| 945 | habitat suitability models | 420 | 686 | 17.76 | 61% |
| 946 | captive chimpanzees | 332 | 495 | 17.76 | 67% |
| 947 | biodiversity decline | 515 | 899 | 17.76 | 57% |
| 948 | key habitat | 653 | 1,211 | 17.76 | 54% |
| 949 | soil conservation service curve number (scs-cn) | 179 | 190 | 17.76 | 94% |
| 950 | remediation of soil | 1,226 | 2,483 | 17.76 | 49% |
| 951 | exotic pests | 224 | 274 | 17.76 | 82% |
| 952 | conservation genetic | 2,571 | 5,150 | 17.76 | 50% |
| 953 | manatees | 452 | 759 | 17.76 | 60% |
| 954 | bonobos | 612 | 1,120 | 17.76 | 55% |
| 955 | restoration of vegetation | 264 | 354 | 17.76 | 75% |
| 956 | conservation success | 330 | 492 | 17.76 | 67% |
| 957 | fragmented land | 1,826 | 3,732 | 17.76 | 49% |
| 958 | critical habitat | 981 | 1,951 | 17.76 | 50% |
| 959 | ex-situ conservation | 379 | 599 | 17.76 | 63% |
| 960 | bioremediation strategy | 234 | 295 | 17.75 | 79% |
| 961 | landscape conservation | 557 | 1,000 | 17.75 | 56% |
| 962 | gray wolf (canis lupus) | 192 | 215 | 17.75 | 89% |
| 963 | enhanced phytoremediation | 201 | 232 | 17.75 | 87% |
| 964 | suitability models | 489 | 847 | 17.75 | 58% |
| 965 | remnant population | 548 | 981 | 17.75 | 56% |
| 966 | contingent valuation | 3,032 | 6,010 | 17.75 | 50% |
| 967 | hyperaccumulator | 1,959 | 4,018 | 17.75 | 49% |
| 968 | global conservation | 822 | 1,606 | 17.75 | 51% |
| 969 | novel ecosystem | 502 | 878 | 17.75 | 57% |
| 970 | piping plovers | 179 | 192 | 17.75 | 93% |
| 971 | scs-cn | 395 | 638 | 17.75 | 62% |
| 972 | riparian forests | 1,024 | 2,061 | 17.75 | 50% |
| 973 | probability of extinction | 417 | 688 | 17.74 | 61% |
| 974 | international conservation | 457 | 778 | 17.74 | 59% |
| 975 | biodiversity policy | 212 | 254 | 17.74 | 83% |
| 976 | bettongia | 236 | 301 | 17.74 | 78% |
| 977 | forest management model | 183 | 200 | 17.74 | 92% |
| 978 | illegal harvesting | 178 | 191 | 17.74 | 93% |
| 979 | native fish | 2,009 | 4,132 | 17.74 | 49% |
| 980 | biodiversity indicator | 525 | 934 | 17.74 | 56% |
| 981 | management and conservation | 4,025 | 7,700 | 17.74 | 52% |
| 982 | habitat alteration | 920 | 1,835 | 17.74 | 50% |
| 983 | holling type | 680 | 1,290 | 17.74 | 53% |
| 985 | service valuation | 265 | 361 | 17.74 | 73% |
| 986 | sustainable harvest | 756 | 1,465 | 17.74 | 52% |
| 987 | agri-environment schemes | 497 | 872 | 17.74 | 57% |
| 988 | conservation and development | 976 | 1,965 | 17.74 | 50% |
| 989 | control of invasive species | 191 | 216 | 17.73 | 88% |
| 990 | endangered species act (esa) | 309 | 455 | 17.73 | 68% |
| 991 | biodiversity loss | 3,978 | 7,655 | 17.73 | 52% |
| 992 | fish conservation | 446 | 759 | 17.73 | 59% |
| 993 | native crayfish | 282 | 398 | 17.73 | 71% |
| 994 | podocnemis | 254 | 340 | 17.73 | 75% |
| 995 | land birds | 1,466 | 3,042 | 17.73 | 48% |
| 996 | habitat patch | 2,040 | 4,218 | 17.73 | 48% |
| 997 | avian conservation | 230 | 292 | 17.73 | 79% |
| 998 | conservation and management strategies | 406 | 670 | 17.73 | 61% |
| 999 | bettong | 260 | 353 | 17.73 | 74% |
| 1000 | ecological corridors | 524 | 939 | 17.73 | 56% |
